How can you tell when the President of the Teachers Union is distorting the truth?
Easy -- her lips are moving!
As one school committee meeting observer noted, he's pretty sure the only completely truthful statement she makes in front of the cameras is when she gives her address -- but he is even tempted to double-check that!
Another case in point was buried at the end of Emptyprize article this week (Surprise -- the Emptyprize missed yet another opportunity to mix a little news in with their pablum !!).
President-For-Life Carlyle stated that "we will meet whenever the School Committee is ready to meet" yet there is absolutely no follow-up to a school committee member's published comment that they were left sitting at the table when the UNION'S attorney cancelled meetings. Wouldn't a logical question to the President-For-Life be -- "Hey, you say you'll meet anytime -- yet you keep cancelling meetings -- what gives?".
There was also a comment about the union working for a zero increase in FY '11. That's bullshit because the FY '11 contract still isn't settled. It may eventually be settled at a 0% -- but if not, her members will be getting retroactive increase checks as soon as the contract is signed. If they really accepted a 0% for all of FY '11 I can't imagine it would be a secret!! They have never signed a contract with a 0% increase.
Then there was a comment about the School Committee reneging on a "tentative agreement" in December of 2010. Standard procedure is for the members of the School Committee's negotiating team to reach a preliminary agreement with the union (and amongst themselves) and then go back to the full School Committee (plus one Selectmen) for a vote. Because of conflicts of interest, the current negotiating team has only 2 members.
Given those mechanics, the "tentative agreement" story is questionable at best! I would suspect that one of the two Negotiating Team members missed a meeting (which happens to people who have real jobs!) and the other one (who has a name very similar to an Australian jumping varmint) decided to advance a proposal all by herself. I would suspect that once the laughter stopped, it was pointed out that a single member (even one that knew what he/she was doing !) can't reach a "tentative agreement" on anything!
Another opportunity to mix a little "research" into the story would have been to follow-up on President-For-Life's comments on comparative salaries. As much as we enjoy stats from the Mass Teachers Association - the Mass Dept. of Education provides average salary teacher compensation for every district in the Commonwealth (Click Here). Here's some better details of average salaries for FY '10:
DISTRICT | Average Salary |
NAUSET | $80,494 |
BARNSTABLE | $72,234 |
CAPE COD | $71,421 |
FALMOUTH | $71,156 |
MASHPEE | $69,883 |
SANDWICH | $69,609 |
STATE AVG | $68,781 |
CHATHAM | $68,534 |
UPPER CAPE COD | $67,543 |
DENNIS YARMOUTH | $67,513 |
BOURNE | $66,010 |
BREWSTER | $65,360 |
HARWICH | $62,322 |
ORLEANS | $62,159 |
PROVINCETOWN | $59,187 |
The more this nonsense drags on, the more I agree with Mike Merolla (not something you hear every day!) -- negotiations should be televised. Let the world see what really is going on -- I would bet the whole process could be wrapped up in no time!
I was once criticized by President-For-Life for referring to the "Theatrics of Negotiation" (when some of her members gave my daughter a hard time during the negotiation of the last contract) -- lately it's become a theater of the absurd. It's unfortunate that her antics and rancid rhetoric seem to have have continued to prolong and distort the negotiating process. She seems to have gone out of her way to stick a finger in the proverbial eye of every taxpayer and even members of every other town and school union. She has done nothing except harm to her cause, her members, her employer, and -- worst of all -- our students.
I hope union members can encourage her to get another hobby.