At a recent School Committee meeting a very vocal anti-pipeline person got up to speak-out against the proposed gas transmission line.
Later, during the same meeting, the same person put on his very vocal pro-pool person hat to speak in favor of getting the pool open as soon as possible.
The Superintendent, as usual, handled the situation very smoothly and said the problem was being reviewed and that they were also looking at improving energy efficiency, and possibly installing a gas heating system in the pool area.
Uh oh.
Now What?
Does he support the Superintendent's potential renovation plans which could certainly increase natural gas usage at the High School? Or does he standby the "Gas is Bad - We're all going to be incinerated" mantra?
Granted a 20" gas transmission line is not the same as increasing the gas flow on the feeder line to the School Pool --- but the gas in the feeder line probably made most its trip across the Country along a 20" transmission line --- which must have gone by the end of somebody's street!
So, is the issue still just safety?