Jim and I have always had a cordial relationship -- we agree on many issues and agree to disagree on others but I think his response to Bob Guerin's description of the latest Golden Triangle fiasco as "silly" is a little over the top. But, then again, I think trying to negotiate a land development deal through the local press is also a little over the top -- so I guess he's being consistent.
I do understand his concern over the attention paid to the amount of money the pool was taking away from the Town's academic budget -- I would probably feel the same way if my daughter-in-law ran the pool programs.
But, I probably would have been a little more careful about referring to the former Superintendent of Schools as "unqualified". People with 35+ years of experience who have worked as Assistant Superintendents and have earned Doctoral degrees might be a little sensitive to that -- particularly when she's already on the winning side of some very costly litigation against the Town.
"Ham Fisted approach to the SEA" ? OK, I have no doubt that's the way the SEA President described it when she met with him -- but most Selectmen don't try to involve themselves in the business of other committees. Although it is nice to see where the Chairman of the Board of Selectmen stands on efforts to control labor costs. Maybe he could make an effort to do that on the Town side?
The loss of students has always been a concern -- but there's not a hell of a lot the School Committee can do about the doubling of Sturgis classroom space and the opening of PJPII High School. I would also venture that opening a pool will not stem the flow of students leaving the District -- for schools without pools! Maybe if some efforts had been made to reduce property taxes, we wouldn't have so many empty 3-4 bedroom houses in town?
And, my favorite: "forcing a contract renewal through a lame-duck School Committee". I'm not sure what he means -- was he referring to Dr. Canfield's renewal which was done this past spring at the meeting immediately prior to the election? Or was he talking about Dr. Johnson's renewal which was done at the meeting before an election several years ago? In any event, both Committees followed the recommended MASC procedure of having the committee who has worked with the Superintendent complete his/her evaluation and renew his/her contract (or not). You wouldn't want somebody evaluating a performance they had never witnessed would you? I'm surprised Jim didn't remember that explanation -- I know it was in several depositions lately -- I guess he really wasn't paying attention to the Town's attorneys.