Tuesday, October 15, 2013

A Coincidence? I think not.

The Times had two interesting items this morning.

First it talked about yet another Town-owned building that has fallen into such disrepair that the occupants have moved out, and the presumed buyer has decided they could not afford the cost of the required renovation & repair work needed to restore the property to its proper function.  The fact that the property is in the Historic District, and is subject to various preservation restrictions further complicated the process.

The interesting part of the story is that the property was actually acquired by the Town through eminent domain in 1973.   The Town thought it was "in the Public Good" to acquire the property, but apparently not to prevent it from turning into a pile of mulch on the shores of Shawme Pond.  It was unusually brave of the Town to finally admit they couldn't afford to maintain it and attempt to sell it in 2011 -- but at that point the damage had been done.  And, even then, The Usual Suspects got up to argue WHY the Town needed to keep the falling down building.  

It's too bad the Usual Suspects hadn't made an effort to generate some real revenue for the Town over the past few decades.  It doesn't take an advanced economics degree to realize the Town has almost no commercial tax base, leaving the vast majority of the tax burden to fall on homeowners.


The "crooked road, small-town charm" mantra wears thin when you look at the rocky beaches and decrepit municipal facilities.  Who would have thought that there was no "Sand" in Sandwich?

Which brings up the second interesting item comparing the Sandwich tax rates with surrounding Towns.  I know there may be arguments over differences in Water Districts, etc. -- but still -- the difference is striking.

Chart from The Cape Cod Times 10/15/2013

I was thinking about this number as I drove through Town this morning -- behind a school bus that made an inordinate number of stops on a street with brand new sidewalks (which were not being walked upon).  I drove past a school that was surrounded by chain link fencing to prevent somebody from being killed by falling masonry and through a down town area where the lower level of the Town Hall annex has been evacuated because it floods at high tide.  I passed a Town Hall where we spent $3.5 million and ended up with a building that had less office space than the original, and a lovely meeting room with a cable TV connection that makes televised meetings look like they are being held in a cave using candles for lighting and tin cans with string for microphones.   (This part of the trip required additional care due to the ongoing $300,000 renovation of the water fountain.)

A quick trip through the Marina area featured the SS Overkill, our new (not) Free Fire Boat that we do (not) need, and a pass by what may some day be a convenience store building in the Marina area -- if the Hysterical Commission is done torturing the private party who actually want to build something, do business, and pay taxes,  in the Town.

Fortunately, I didn't see the proposed $5 million Boardwalk to Nowhere, or a massive new $15 million Library "branch" which featured video conferencing facilities, community meeting rooms, and "rooms which could be rented out for pizza parties"!  Surprisingly, We have managed to avoid a few expensive ways to burn tax dollars!

Sorry, I got distracted ...

You're asking for how much to fix the pool that was never properly maintained?

And, how much for the windows sills which are falling out because of poor construction & maintenance?  (If the windows need to be re-sealed every 5 years, I guess we found out what happens if you wait 15 years!)

12 comments:

Mrs. Beasley said...

Why do we even have a BOS? The lack of leadership and testicular fortitude is astounding! They simply serve as the middle man -- why can't they just say NO to the pool funding. I understand the NEED to have the SHS windows repaired so putting that to the voters is understandable. The biggest problem in this town is a total lack of leadership. No one is willing to just say NO. Maybe if taxpayors continue to vote NO on every request made for an increase in our taxes, the BOS will finally get the message. Don't waste our time and taxpayors dollars on Special Town Meetings. NO NEW TAXES!

The Truth Maker said...

Continue the drive to the Old supers building and observe how that building is just about ready to also fall. The same one that some in the historical district also failed to keep up ,but now want it saved at the expense of the tax payers. Look at the road way leading out to the Board Walk, watch out for the deep holes that no one is concerned about and the appearance of the end when you go to park.

Both questions will be before town meeting in attempt to get some finalazation to the question in regards to repairing the high school and pool. If they pass there then the voters of Sandwich will determine the fate of each project. Once what ever that vote may turn out to be the school district can plan accordingly.

Repairing the structual part of the High school that is failing due to a lack of proper engineering and maintence over the years should be a no brainer and should pass as this is a safety issue and dangerous for our children that may be using it.

The pool on the other hand is not something that I can support at this time due to many reasons, one is what is the pay back for the investment required to repair it?

It may be a program issue, but when one considers all of the other town needs, due to many years of neglect and ofsetting maintenance needs along with having town employees working in
un healthy environmental conditions [sick buildings that should be condemmed] I would place that above the needs of a pool.

Thanks to the lack of support by the Sandwich Economic Initative Corporation I do not see any further development, other then the South Sandwich Village progect having any impact on our commercial base here in Sandwich. This will be the only true commercial base which is looming on the horizans, no matter what the SEIC tells you.

Anonymous said...

Does anybody think it strange that this issue bypassed the school committee entirely?

Why haven't they voted on the almost $1 million it will take to reopen the pool?

Canfields answer about them not having a meeting scheduled is bullshit --- they can call a meeting in 48 hours. Besides, i am sure this report has been floating around in draft form for weeks ---- there was no reason to hide the details until the very last minute.

I smell a rat. If the school committee won't support this, why should i?


Anonymous said...

It will be amusing to see Crossman voting to approve installation of a pool heater run by the same gas that she has been hysterically claiming was unsafe when it passed near her house.

Anonymous said...

8:36AM

Laughed out loud on that one!!! Classic!

Anonymous said...

It's beyond frustrating to me that the town markets itself as a quaint and historical town but then neglects the maintenance required to maintain the very buildings that support that notion. These buildings should never have gotten to the point where they now need a $15,000 cultural needs assessment. I find it ironic that soon 25% of the buildings on the walking village map will be "enter at your own risk." This is what happens when you give things to government - they become expensive ornaments.

Ann Coulter said...

8:32 -- It's all a game.

The School Committee Chair would never want to endorse an Override and stir up the RTC crowd.

Crossman doesn't care because her poolies will still only get limited access -- and she wouldn't want anybody pointing out she's a lying hypocrite on the gas issue. Kangas "the Budget Watch Dog" seems to have either finally been sedated into silence -- or she's distracted wondering if her Home Owner's insurance has sufficient liability coverage.

The other 4 are relatively pleasant but seem to be trying to remember why they ran -- and how much longer before they can get off.

The Truth Maker said...

to 836 the gas pipe line that feeds the school now ,presently runs through the same area that the [no gas line in my back yard group] were all upset about.
They never factually acknowledged any gas lines going to the school now ever existed. It was all a smoke screen about what is truthful and what is not.Those that did their homework know where the truth lies and it sure is not with you know who.

Anonymous said...

While I am sure they would be delighted to be considered "relatively pleasant" by someone who calls herself Ann Coulter, I don't think it's quite fair to say the other 4 seem to be trying to remember why they ran. If I'm not mistaken each of them has children or grandchildren in the school system, and I'd say it's a fair bet each would cite these children as a reason why they ran (which is more than you can say for the chairman, by the way), and that they haven't forgotten them. It is also a fair bet that each of them is doing hours of work each month in subcommittees and that the business meetings of the SC as a whole are not the best use of anyone's time, including yours.

Anonymous said...

I don't fully understand by Chair Killon is even on the school committee board when she chose to send her child to private schooling! Obviously she thought that was a better choice for her child than what the Sandwich School System could offer!!!

Anonymous said...

Whats not to understand?

She ran, she got more votes, she got elected. Maybe she wanted to work to improve the district so other people don't feel they need to send their kids elsewhere.

She's certainly not making any personal gains for spending so many hours on school business.

Anonymous said...

Several committee members in recent years have had kids in private school. So what?