Sunday, December 12, 2010

Curious Thing #1 - Superintendent Search (The Sequel)

Member of the Secret Search Committee
This week's School Committee Agenda shows another 6 PM meeting with the Consultants for the Superintendent Search.  This is at least the second off-camera meeting regarding the process the Committee intends to follow to replace the Superintendent they may have ousted last summer.

I assume it will be a public meeting -- there's nothing in OML that would exclude it from public view yet.  But, unless somebody just happens to be cruising the Town Clerk's bulletin board, or regularly checking school committee agendas -- you might miss the fact that the Committee will be gathering an hour before the cameras are scheduled to arrive to discuss the most important thing a School Committee does -- hire a new Superintendent.


While this may be a public meeting, for a group that screamed about "lack of transparency" and "back room deals" involving the last school committee it seems strange that they would go to such great lengths to keep the public from seeing what they are doing this time.


It is starting to smell just like the last Superintendent Search Committee.  Unfortunately, this time around it is unlikely that this school committee will recognize a Bag Job and throw out the "results".   (Although since the last search committee only managed to produce two out of state finalists who didn't bother to come back for a second interview, and one local candidate who had already been turned down by several other districts -- I would venture that they never actually produced ANY  results!)

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Two memebers of the SEA are being appointed to the 11 member search committee. I get to pick my boss!

Anonymous said...

Let's see if it will be a certain SC member's husband. That will be a dynamic duo.

Anonymous said...

If that's true and you add Sherry and Jess (aka union plants) then the board will have at least 4 out of 11, plus there will be more "random" (union or Comm School cozy)members chosen for the search team. We smell another set up for the next super they are now 3 for 4. that's right the kids lose, Unions always win!

Anonymous said...

Why not just appoint Carlisle directly -- it will save her some trouble.

I hope the consultant is used to dealing with the sort of nonsense the SEA is famous for.

pied piper said...

What happened to that BS that linehands keep spouting last year about public access to info? Why is she hiding these meetings off-camera?

I smell a rat ..... again.