Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Before you ask me for an override...

The current economic climate does not bode well for an override -- either capital or operating.  There certainly may be some legitimate reasons to ask -- BUT the fact is that too many people have seen their incomes diminished with no related decrease in living expenses.

Before anybody asks me for more of my money, I would like to see:

1)  A Plan -- If we know that municipal expenses are climbing faster than the related tax revenue, what are we doing about it?  Wage freezes are helpful (and appreciated), but long-term, we need to expect a serious reduction in services.  What services are going to be reduced?  What services would my tax increase preserve?

2)  Realistic labor contracts -- the biggest expenses we face are labor-related costs.  We have no choice but to reduce headcount.  Whose heads would my tax increase preserve?  (I would be far more willing to save the heads of the folks who have been trying to solve the problem.)  Like the private sector, we will likely lose some good employees to better-paying towns.  It's unavoidable.

3) More consolidation & cooperation -- what services can we share with other Towns?  Why can't we share Building Inspectors, or Dog Catchers with Bourne or Mashpee?  Why don't we have a centralized maintenance facility that would maintain & repair all town-owned vehicles -- Police, DPW, Fire, Schools, etc.? 

4)  Consolidate non-essential services and charge those that utilize them.  A real Recreation Department would be a great place to consolidate Beaches, the Golf course, the Marina, The Oakcrest Cove Yacht Basin (aka O'Keefe's Cottages), The Pool, The Community School, and assorted fields.  These are all fun places -- but the world would not stop if they disappeared.   These operations should be required to cover ALL of their operating expenses and related debt service -- which would likely require bifurcating the golf course debt from the conservation land debt. 

5)  Dump the Dump -- I admit I get more value from my dump sticker than somebody without 4 kids.  Folks benefitting from the use of the Town's transfer statement should bear the cost of that service. But let's also look at the costs -- do we really need more people on duty at the dump than we have at the Fire Department?  Are we REALLY making enough from scrap metal sales to justify the cost of paying somebody to sit there and babysit it? 

6)  Build a Building --- combine the 3-4 Town Office buildings, with Police & Fire in a single new building --- and sell everything else.  I wouldn't mind paying a capital override if it was going to consolidate operations and reduce long term operating costs.  It makes no sense to spend more money patching obsolete facilities.  I've never understood spending $3 million to re-do Town Hall so that it has LESS useable office space -- and more public meeting space (with minimal parking & septic capacities).  If you need meeting space -- use a school!

7)  Consider suspending contributions to the Community Preservation Fund.  There are numerous restrictions and obligations associated with this program -- but is there is a potential to suspend contributions for a specified period of time?  This may allow tax dollars to be diverted to preserve  essential services for at least a limited time.  Realistically, funding a fire/police station is far more important to the "greater good" than renovating a church -- or some other old building.  (The discussion regarding potential funding for the dilapidated Clark-Haddad building made me cringe!)

8)  Revisit the conversation about the privatization of building maintenance and food service operations at the schools.  The prior Business Manager claimed these were "no win'" proposals.  BUT consider revisiting them with the current, more aggressive, school administration -- and maybe a small committee of townspeople with experience in financial analysis and operational planning.

9) Revisit the discussion of School Transportation costs.  There have been far bigger balls in play  at the School Dept. lately.  But, earlier this year,  the Superintendent made a bold move by using operating funds  to purchase 4 vans and take over some transport services from the Cape Cod Collaborative.  This move saved the District approximately $300K this year -- even AFTER deducting the cost of the vans.  The use of part-time drivers also further reduced costs by eliminating full-time employee benefit costs.  We also need to review transportation costs  with an eye towards reducing/eliminating free transportation to those not entitled by law.

10)  Review the School District's relationship with the Cape Cod Collaborative.  Although the concept of sharing resources with other Districts to provide Special Education services is certainly sound -- the reality is that the CCC provides another layer of bureaucracy that frequently resulted in inflated costs.  Sandwich has reduced this expense considerably by bringing some transportation and SPED services back in-house.  This review process needs to be expanded and the new Sandwich reps to the CCC needs to more aggressively pursue cost efficiencies at the Colloborative so that it can achieve its original objective of saving member district costs.

11)  Admit that the Commercial Development ship left the dock without us.  It has been pointed out very clearly that even if we could squeeze in two more plazas the size of the 6A Stop & Shop, the average taxpayer would not save enough money to buy dinner at the Taverna!  The development restrictions of  "The Olde Day" have effectively doomed us to depend on residential development to carry the majority of our local tax burden.  And, since we don't have the nice beaches and warm water of the other Cape towns, we also don't have the second homes -- owned by those nice people who pay their taxes but use very few services ... particularly school services!


At the risk of sounding pessimistic, we really are looking over a cliff.  And, next Spring when the annual crop of candidates starts talking about "working together", "thinking outside the box", "transparency", and the fact that they "Know there is a huge amount of waste out there" (although they can't actually say where "there" is!) --- if they don't have some sort of professional experience, I may be tempted to push them over that cliff!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

You hit the nail on the head -- 11 times!

People need to get their heads out of the sand and start paying attention.

There is more to life than Pop Warner and soccer.

Anonymous said...

the plan is that there is no plan. State aid is dropping like a rock. The power plant is obsolete, hasn't sold a single kilowatt of saleable electricity in over a year making its tax contributions also falling like a rock. Already stated, no new commercial on the horizen. Town government and service costs increasing. No sale of the Bronze Triangle, Agilent (now a town hall and propably remaining as such). No marina expansion. Plan? Find out, tell us then we will both know.

The Truth Maker said...

The Truth Maker states that the power plant is under new ownership as we post. One may soon see a name change. What will happen, once our present contract expires will be any one guess.

The expansion of the marina is a pipe dream in heaven. To many obsticles and differences of opinions as to what needs to be done to make any impact. Remember this expansion is on Taxpayers owned land, not Army Corp. Would you like to take a guess as to what was buried under this land that once was part of the original marina. It just may be an evironmental disaster for the town Put up a harbor hotel and resteraunt on the top floor over looking the whole bay, rather then digging it up may be the best option for the town.

The Golden triangle needs one motivated and knowledgable person to put together a plan that can meet the expectations of a real economic development here in Sandwich. Not a bunch of politized individuals that dictate what they want and do not want on this land.

How about a Kentucky Fried or other fast food stop over. What ever happened to assisted living senior housing? What about a bike trail, with small shops that accomondate the bike traffic?

What about some recreastional places that the children of our community can participate in?

What is wrong with space above small business fronts that folks can rent out. I could go on, but this topic has been beat to death by those that enjoy the debates, but not the work.

Donald Trump said...

The only problem with putting something on top of the powerplant site is that you still would need to burrow into the great unknown below the surface -- a likely environmental minefield-- in order to put in a sufficient foundation to hold up the building.

It won't be popular, but the best use for that site is probably an expanded power plant and the associated personal property tax it will generate.

The newer plants are much cleaner than the current dinosaur and the taxes on the plant & equipment (not just real estate) would far surpass anything that could be generated from retail/residential/tourism use.

But ... would YOU want to support that?

A KFC would be fun, but would be such a distraction to the Hysterical Commission, and the "no progress or chain store" crowd that nothing else would ever get built and nobody would even be thinking of any other projects.

The infamous Tin Triangle given its size and environmental constraints just will not produce enough benefit to save the world.

Maybe we should just rent dock space at Peter's Pond?

Anonymous said...

........better yet, seeing as a selectman has chimed in on a particular topic on this blog, perhaps she could enlighten the Sandwich residents as what exactly what this towns plan is?